|
|
|
Ten
Thousand Things
Multicultural Webfinds
"Ten
Thousand Things" is a Buddhist expression representing the dynamic
interconnection and simultaneous unity and diversity of everything in
the universe.
History
Wars in Japan: Stopping the Erasure of Coerced WWII "Suicides"
in History Texts
"History is hot (and) unceasingly controversial because it
provides so much of the substance for the way a society defines itself
and considers what it wants to be..."
– History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past
The parallels between the history wars between Japan's neoconservative
politicians and progressive and grassroots Japanese and American neoconservative
politicians and progressive and grassroots Americans is astoundingly similar,
as well as those in other nations. The common denominator comes down to
the conflict between those who seek to impose their party line authoritarian
versions of history that glorify the state, and those who support critical
histories that encourage multiple perspectives and multiple voices in
ongoing debate and dialogue.
I just finished taking a second look at Edward T. Linenthal's and Tom
Engelhardt's History
Wars: The Enola Gay and Other Battles for the American Past,
which critiques one of America's "sacred national narratives,"
along with History
on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past
by Gary B. Nash, Charlotte Crabtree and Ross E. Dunn, and Jonathan Zimmerman's
Whose
America? Culture Wars in the Public Schools.
According to Nash, Crabtree, and Dunn, many of the world's nations have
been experiencing similar conflicts over history, as they explain in their
chapter "History Wars Abroad." In the U.K., the New Right's
desire to maintain the centuries of glorification of British empire and
history has clashed with progressives who seek to emphasize the UK's "gloomy
record of social conflict, struggle, and change." In Russia, the
clash over how to critically examine the glorification of Leninist ideologies
has taken a huge step backward as recent police state advocates seek to
mitigate past totalitarianism to legitimate current repression. In South
Africa, educators have had to totally reconstruct an educational paradigm
built on a century of white supremacist ideology. And in Japan, we see
another generation continue the legacy of Ienaga Saburo's challenges of
censorship of wartime history.
Nash, Crabtree, and Dunn see a hopeful aspect in all these history wars:
"That a rash of history wars should occur in the United States and
several other countries in the 1980's and 1990's is no coincidence...Public
contests over history are characteristic not of totalitarian regimes but
of countries where democracy is either blooming or persevering."
Throughout the world, we are also seeing an incredible reclamation of
erased histories, from Harriet Washington's brilliant Medical
Apartheid:The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans
from Colonial Times to the Present detailing how African
Americans were used in unbelievably inhumane forced medical experiments
from colonial times to the present -- to Caroline Elkins' Imperial
Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya
which sets the record straight on Britain's brutal torture and ethnic
cleansing (genocide?) of 1.4 million Kikuyu people in Kenya -- to Jean
Pfaelzer's DRIVEN
OUT: The Forgotten War Against Chinese Americans, about
the ethnic cleansing of Chinese Americans in numerous towns in the western
United States.
In this light, it's buoying to see the recent protests by 100,000 Okinawans
and other Japanese against the state's attempt to omit the established
fact that the Japanese Imperial military coerced suicides in Okinawa after
the war. These activists are stopping the erasures of history before the
erasures can happen, by amplifying authentic voices and passing down truthful,
personal stories to the next generation now.
I am now wondering if the most dynamic public debates over official histories
happens in Japan -- from heated dialogue over war responsibility to how
to construct collective memories. I haven't observed anything like this
in the United States since the conflicts over the Enola Gay exhibition
at the Smithsonian, which was won by the official party-liners, although
a huge interest in popular critical histories has exploded in the U.S.
Jean Pfaelzer said that she was surprised that there was a bidding war
on her book, published this year, on the ethnic cleansing of Chinese Americans
throughout the American West -- she thought it wouldn't sell. I know that
critical histories have been popular in Japan since the 1970's. Historian
Yoshihiko Amino's <http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/journal/vol4no1/amino.html>
brilliant revisionist histories challenging the idea of a homogenous Japanese
monoculture from "time immemorial" has had a following among
a huge Japanese readership.
So, more power to the Japanese and Okinawans demanding critical histories
that include diverse voices. I see these grassroots activists as kindred
spirits of those around the world in similar loggerheads with authoritarian
politicians still trying to push simplistic glorified party lines on their
citizens. It seems all people know instinctively that the truth really
does set us free. Is that why authoritarians are so afraid of the truth?
Martin
Frid has a great photograph and link to a Daily Yomiuri
article:
"Yomiuri Shinbun reports that 110,000
people in Okinawa, southern Japan, participated in the peaceful demonstration
this weekend. They rallied against the Education Ministry's order to modify
school textbooks describing how Japan's Imperial Army forced civilians
to commit mass suicide at the end of World War II. It is the biggest demonstration
since the island was returned to Japan by the United States in 1972, Kyodo
News agency said."
David McNeill has a good overview in The
Independent:
"In March, Japan's Education Ministry ordered
publishers of secondary school history textbooks to delete references
to coercion by Japanese troops. "There are divergent views of whether
or not the suicides were ordered by the army and no proof to say either
way," a ministry official told the Stars and Stripes, the US military's
daily newspaper.
"One passage in a textbook was changed from: "Japanese forces
made [residents] commit mass suicide and kill one another using hand grenades
that [the Japanese forces] had distributed." To: "Using hand
grenades that Japanese forces had distributed, mass suicide and the killing
of one another took place."
"'It's an Orwellian move,' says Doug Lummis, a local academic and
former American soldier. 'This is an attempt to send these peoples' memories
down the plughole of history. They're not going to stand for it.'
"The Battle of Okinawa raged for three months in 1945 and took 200,000
Japanese and American lives, including about a quarter of the local population.
Japanese troops were ordered to stall a full-scale invasion of the mainland.
Mass suicides of families indoctrinated by military propaganda, including
mothers and their babies, have been well documented.
"The American invasion, and the presence of thousands of US troops
as part of the US-Japan military alliance has had a deep impact on the
area. Dozens of peace monuments dot the island and resentment at what
many locals see as Tokyo's arrogance runs deep.
"Okinawa's local government has reacted with fury to the Education
Ministry directive, issuing an unprecedented unanimous statement in June
demanding that the government reverse its decision. "It is an undeniable
fact that mass suicides could not have occurred without the involvement
of the Japanese military," said the statement.
"More than 100,000 signatures have been collected against the directive
and Hirokazu Nakaima, the island's governor and a member of the ruling
Liberal Democratic Party, is taking part in today's demonstration, an
embarrassing snub to the central government. School children will tell
the protesters why they will not use the censored textbooks and witnesses
of the battle will recount their stories..."
Previous
........... Next
Back to Ten
Thousand Things index page...
|
|