KJ
Selections
Kyoto
Journal #64, Nov-Dec 2006
Questioning Gender
An interview with Japan-based psychotherapist
Kim Oswalt
By Stewart Wachs

Kim Oswalt, an American psychotherapist who has been working
with transgender clients in Japan for nearly five years, does not view
transsexuality as a mental disorder. The very real suffering that Oswalt
seeks to relieve is, she says, partly rooted in the client’s social
context — in society’s rigid insistence on stable, binary
gender role archetypes. Seen in this light, the true disorder becomes
the widespread aversion known as transphobia: intolerant attitudes and
discriminatory behavior towards transgender people. In many cases, Oswalt
says, transgender clients themselves internalize this transphobia, setting
up a severe inner conflict.
“Nearly everyone is indoctrinated into a binary mindset,”
she contends.
Oswalt earned her MA in Contemplative Psychotherapy at the Naropa Institute
in Colorado, where she wrote a Buddhist-inspired thesis that drew upon
the Heart Sutra as a key text. She recalls “being required
to go for a month each year to meditate in the mountains and watch that
ego construction dissolve at your feet. And then the ways that we scrambled
to put it back together again, and how that perpetuates suffering —
that whole scenario, saying, ‘This is who I am and I’m separate
from you, a permanent entity here, and I’ve got a story to tell
and it’s very consistent.’ If you hang out in the meditation
hall long enough and follow the instructions, you’re going to
realize how unstable that story is.”
For years prior to Naropa, Oswalt had been deeply involved in human
rights work and community organizing: peace and justice activism, refugee
resettlement, advocacy for the homeless and victims of domestic violence.
While studying psychotherapy, Oswalt became acquainted with a transgender
female classmate, and through this relationship she came to see that
transgender people and those who identify as genderqueer* sometimes
face identity issues, and more threateningly, formidable social hurdles.
After completing the program, she and her colleague teamed up to form
a transgender support group in Boulder. Oswalt brought to this endeavor
both her Buddhist perspective and her social conscience. “I had
done my internship at University of Colorado Multicultural Psychological
Services,” she explains, “looking at the social construction
of mental illness, the ways in which the dynamics of oppression and
privilege play into psychological struggles. You don’t look at
a depressed person without also asking about their income, ethnicity,
or sexual orientation, and then you put their depression into a matrix
to understand them psychologically.”
Kim Oswalt’s earliest childhood memories are of Japan; when she
was one year old, she and her mother came to Japan by ship to join her
father, then in the military. The family stayed until Oswalt was three,
and Japan would lure her back for several more years in the 1980s, when
she began to study the koto. For many years, with a musical
partner on shakuhachi, she performed and recorded contemporary
Japanese music professionally. Not long after returning to Japan in
2002, Oswalt offered a workshop for about sixty members of the Japanese
transgender community, mainly male-to-female (MtF). Next, she helped
to organize Japan’s first female-to-male (FtM) support group,
a springboard for ongoing transgender community organizing.
Oswalt lives in Karuizawa, Nagano Prefecture, and sees her clients both
there and in her Tokyo office.
*Genderqueer: Someone who rejects the traditional gender
binary and identifies as a) neither male nor female, b) as both, or
c) as a combination thereof.
Stewart
Wachs: What is it that attracts Japanese transgender clients
to you, a non-Japanese therapist?
Kim Oswalt: Well, many psychotherapists here are undereducated
about how to work with transgender people and what their needs are.
That’s true in many countries, including the U.S. What transgender
people will often ask for help with is undoing their own internalized
transphobia. And there’s a lot of institutional and cultural support
for that voice which says, “I must be mentally ill.” There’s
also a diagnosis in the DSM-IV (the current edition of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). It’s called
“gender identity disorder (G.I.D.).” So what people will
often present when they come to therapy is this notion that for some
strange reason I look in the mirror and I don’t recognize what
I see as my body. I don’t identify with the gender I
was assigned at birth, and because of that there must be something wrong
with me. Any good therapist, in my opinion, would start with
how to help the person untie the knots of internalized oppression. But
some therapists instead ask, “How do we help this person recover
and go back to the gender that they were assigned to at birth?”
They don’t accept the fact that the person identifies as some
other gender. Haven’t you heard of therapists that are trying
to help “recovering” gays and lesbians? That’s a very
dangerous game.
I have a client here in Japan who collapsed one day in the street, just
from looking at a particular female and seeing her as a mirror. This
person, forty-something and biologically assigned at birth as male,
went to a psychiatrist who said, “You’re suffering from
bipolar disorder.” But the client said, “No, I don’t
think that’s it. I may be talking very fast, and not sleeping
at night, and I may look very manic to you, but I think there’s
something about seeing that woman on the street and realizing that I
was looking at myself.” And this person presented as very stereotypically
male. It was a tipping point of consciousness: someone finally getting
it that “my problem up until now has not been that I’m
an unhappy person or that I suffer from a mental disorder, but that
I am not the male that I have up until now tried to be.”
This client has now so altered her physical appearance that she now
recognizes herself when she looks in the mirror. She speaks much more
slowly and articulately; she looks much more comfortable in her body,
she is happy, and her wife is not divorcing her. And I must
say, in my experience, this is the first time I’ve watched a couple
who initially identified as heterosexual go through this transition
together and stay together. They also did couples counseling to help
them with their adjustment. The wife had concerns about her shifting
identity, her own sense of looking like a lesbian couple, and feelings
of loss that the person who used to be her “husband” is
now her female partner. This couple has stayed together and so far so
good. The client, whom I have been seeing individually, is as happy
as she’s ever been, and she’s even kept her job. That, too,
is unusual: for an employer to maintain the employee after gender transition.
She’s scheduled for gender reassignment surgery in a couple of
weeks, and she’s altered her legal documents to conform with her
female identity.
Another client who came to me was a schoolteacher. He very much identified
as male but presented as female. The greatest concern, aside from losing
his teaching job, was that his family of origin would never accept him
as male. And he agonized over how to maintain the intimacy that he loved
and shared with his family while coming out to them as a transgender
male. Over a period of many months we talked about how he was going
to do this. Finally, one day he showed up for counseling just elated,
and said, “I finally did it!” The family had lined up in
a washitsu, a tatami room. He, on the other side of
the room, bowing to the family: father, mother, and all of the siblings.
“I have something I want to talk with you all about,” he
said. “From now on, I want you to pronounce my name differently.
The same kanji, but I want you to call me by a more male-sounding
name. The reason I want you to do that is because I don’t identify
as female, but as male. I may look the same to you, and I may never
even alter my appearance, but I identify as male, and it would mean
a lot to me if you would all call me by this name.” And much to
his surprise and joy, his mother burst into tears and said, “How
you have been suffering and I didn’t know! If I had known I would
have always called you by that name. We want you so much to be happy.”
These positive examples suggest that transphobia can be overcome.
How might the experience of transgender and genderqueer people in Japan
be different from, say, the U.S.?
The moral and spiritual roots of Japanese culture are different from
Judeo-Christian roots. Japan has a history of polytheism: many small
gods. There are the gods of the mountain, the kitsune fox god,
and the gods that live in trees, and even today Shinto priests offer
prayers essentially asking for forgiveness from the tree spirits before
they cut trees to build a house. It’s almost like a shamanistic
root that goes back beyond Buddhism, and they still live in Shintoism
and shamanism. Monotheism can foster the notion that “my god is
right and yours is wrong,” or doesn’t exist. But if your
god is a god of the mountain, and mine is a god of the trees, we’re
probably going to get along fine because mountains need trees and trees
need mountains.
Spiritually speaking, this is a very pluralistic society. People get
married in a church, and on the same day they may go to the Shinto shrine,
and when a relative dies they'll go to the Buddhist temple. On a wedding
day, if they want to put on a kimono and then switch to a white lacy
dress nobody’s got a problem. The more the merrier. My inkling
is there’s something here that makes life a bit easier for transgender
people than in the U.S. They're not told that they’re going to
hell for being transgender. God does not hate them; you don’t
hear that here in Japan. You may have social prejudice, but you also
see people like Miwa Akihiro, a transgender female with blonde hair,
being consulted on NHK-TV by everyday people, like Dear Abby, and she’s
elevated. Folks really want to know what she thinks about things,
and they’re not even talking about the fact that she’s transgender.
That is probably not likely to happen in mainstream U.S. culture.
And then there’s the koseki (official family register)
issue that has finally been altered here in Japan. If one goes through
x number of medical interventions and meets a list of strict criteria,
one can change one’s legal gender designation. But that’s
a very recent change in policy, and it was led by the (conservative)
LDP party, of all things. Is that going to happen in the Republican
Congress? Highly unlikely! So although there is trans-oppression here
in Japan, I think there is a degree of tolerance in this culture that
distinguishes it from the U.S., and this benefits transgender and genderqueer
people. Here are two examples: the longstanding tradition of kabuki
theater, where men play female roles, and more recently the Takarazuka
Review [see KJ #64, P. 96], where the reverse holds true. These are
ways in which Japanese culture tolerates and even celebrates gender
diversity.
With that said, transgender still seems to be a cutting-edge human
rights issue here.
Yes. There’s just no way you can work in the transgender communities
effectively and not be politicized. It’s everyone’s
issue. As they say, gender rights are human rights. Those professionals
who offer only a diagnostic medical model misunderstand gender variance
to be a pathological mental state. And as mental health providers we’re
supposed to be doing no damage, yet I think that is damaging.
When you say “medical model,” I assume you’re
not talking about the doctors who actually perform the surgeries and
hormone therapies for gender reassignment?
Right, that’s different. That also involves human rights issues.
But I’m talking about doctors who might keep a patient waiting
for hours for a five-minute session that determines whether or not they’ll
be prescribed with hormones. And it’s a very fine line: The reason
why somebody would be given masculinizing hormones, for instance, with
coverage under the Japanese medical insurance system, would be because
they have a diagnosable mental illness. So there’s some advantage
and disadvantage: if you buy into having G.I.D., with the support of
a psychiatrist, Japanese national health insurance pays for hormones.
On a practical level, that’s very important financial support.
Then there’s the question of male privilege. Many in the FtM community
who have been treated like second-class citizens all their lives discover,
after taking masculinizing hormones, that their voices drop, they start
growing beards, and they’re being given privileges they never
had before. These people, while changing their bodies, do not want to
lose their feminist values by exercising male privilege.
What are the developmental stages with transgender clients, keeping
in mind individual differences?
There’s no one way that things go, in a universal sense. But an
initial step would often be to look at the degree of internalized oppression,
and identifying the sources of it, so that the person can access a new
voice, like waking up after a bad dream, and say, “Maybe there’s
nothing wrong with me at all.”
Another step would be to help clients feel comfortable with whatever
changes they may want to go through with clothes, makeup or hormones
— to help them start considering the possibility that all of those
things are within reach. I have a client who in the very early stages
was extremely transphobic and afraid to go out dressed up in more “female”
clothing. So we agreed to meet in Shinjuku at a very classy place for
coffee, so that we could walk in and the maitre d’ would simply
ask, “How many?” And this client felt so happy just to be
able to go out in public dressed as she felt most comfortable.
Another stage may be outrage: “What’s going on here that
I would feel so twisted, unable to be myself?” Recognizing that
there is oppression in reality, and where it comes from.
Yet another stage might be, “I thought I had to have long fingernails
and makeup and three-inch stilettos, but I can still be a female and
wear a T-shirt and jeans with hiking boots. Maybe even no makeup. Why
do I need to pass, and for whom?” Having said that, it
is also true that many do need to pass in order to get and
keep a job. These issues are complicated. A person needs income.
Now, again, these linear-sounding stages are not universal to everyone.
I have a client who’s perfectly happy to stay in three-inch high
heels, buy handbags at Gucci, wear lots of makeup and speak in a falsetto
voice, and she doesn’t feel that she needs to “progress,”
you know? She likes herself just exactly the way she is right now and
she’s happy to be “beautiful” in a very stereotypic
way. That’s what she understands herself to be. On the other hand,
there are many identifying as women who see that a woman is also more
vulnerable to rape or domestic abuse. It’s not up to me to patronize
any client by convincing them they should be some “other way.”
If a transwoman wants to ask those questions herself, we can surely
explore them in the name of her being more free to wear more comfortable
clothes, and be able to run in her shoes if she wants to. I’d
also like to say a few words about class differences within transgender
communities which make medical intervention possible for some yet unavailable
to others, for example expensive facial reconstruction or gender reassignment
surgery.
Which raises the question: Is there any infighting in transgender
or genderqueer communities?
With
marginalized groups you tend to have a lot of infighting, instead of
looking at where the ultimate power really is. On the one hand it’s
important to realize that the FtM and MtF people have differences, but
if we use that to divide ourselves from the greater issue of transgender
oppression then we’ve defeated ourselves. Even within
the MtF community there are all kinds of divisions going on, and it’s
very sad. It’s all about the pecking order of, okay, if you are,
for example, a cross-dresser and you cross-dress after five, but in
your nine-to-five job you stay in your male mode, then you’re
not threatened with the loss of your job. Your family may or may not
know. You’re still functioning pretty well but just going out
and buying pretty clothes, and after five you get to drag around in
the bars. But if you say, “I’m transgender,” and you
go fulltime, you’re putting your job on the line, you may lose
your children, your spouse may divorce you, and maybe you don’t
even have the money for laser surgery and you’ve got beard growth.
That’s a different level of risk. Then there may be some internalized
oppression saying, “Oh look, you’ve gotten the
money to have cosmetic surgery, so you look more beautiful than I do.”
I have a client who’s going this week and spending millions of
yen on cosmetic facial surgery to get rid of facial hair so she will
look more feminine. There are all these little divisions even within
just the MtF community. If I can afford costly facial surgery am I somehow
better than you? Or, why would a cross-dresser be less important
than somebody who identifies as transgender? I’m just giving you
a little taste of it here.
And then on the ultimate level, the Heart Sutra says no man,
no woman, no I, no you, none of this is ultimately true. But on the
relative level it’s very true. And so how do we be compassionate
and honor the relative level as something that teaches us about the
ultimate level of truth? They’re all mixed in together. If we
weren’t in this messy, three-dimensional world we might not be
able to understand things as well about the ultimate. In a way it’s
a teaching ground. If you want to put your compassion to work, in my
opinion you’re not going to be able to avoid messy battles and
conditions. Things are just not clean, and they’re sometimes very
confusing.
Speaking of confusion, many people have trouble understanding genderqueer
people — that is, if they know anything about them.
Yes, the idea of transgender is transitioning towards something, having
an endpoint in mind: for example, female, or at least female-ish. Whereas
genderqueer folks are saying “neither/nor, both/and, I don’t
even want to talk about gender because I don’t believe in it,
and don’t genderize me. I don't want to be called female or male.
I just want to be myself.” It’s as if to say the whole idea
of gender is oppressive.
Do they organize politically?
Yeah. One example would be FtM groups here in Japan. A lot of those
people might take masculinizing hormones simply because they want to
transform their bodies, or have chest reconstruction if they can afford
it. But they may not identify as male. For many, genderqueer is a revolutionary
term implying anarchy and overturning established binary structure.
They are about not assimilating, not trying to pass,
or look like anything that makes another person feel comfortable.
And this is all within the Japanese context as well?
Yes, there’s that element as well in Japan. One example is the
Queer & Women’s Center in Osaka. Several people I know very
well started that organization. They’re about queer politics,
which are a lot more about upsetting power structures than about getting
electrolysis and passing. On the other hand, everything has another
voice, and that’s why I want to be really careful. I am an ally
and an advocate but I don’t identify as transgender myself, so
I want to be very careful in not making blanket statements. After all,
there is something very important to be recognized about the need to
pass — for one’s safety, for one’s job. You can’t
just say, “Oh well, who cares and I’m just genderqueer”
when you’ve got to pay your electric bill this month and be able
to keep your job. In the U.S., there are certain neighborhoods where
if I don’t pass pretty well, my life is going to be endangered.
So I don’t want to say that passing is a sellout.
Each case is different. What I hold in the back of my mind when I work
with my own clients is, “How do I help this person feel most empowered,
and most themselves, whatever that means on any given day, since it’s
subject to change.”
For anyone oriented toward Buddhism these cases offer opportunities
for our minds to wake up. My own mind has been through so many revolutions
just because of having to change my language and my way of seeing the
world. Nevertheless, our egos will sometimes get in the way even though
we’ve meditated and meditated. I myself still get threatened,
really scared, going into uncharted territories, and I think, “Well,
I don’t know where this client wants to go, but I am going to
walk with them and hopefully be their companion while we walk through
some pretty scary places."
Stewart
Wachs is KJ's associate managing editor, and was inspired to write this
article by UK transgender activist Mark
Rees. Copyright is held by the author.
Back to Selections
Subscriptions