Current
Issue (#68)
 


Home

About KJ

KJ News

Selections

Back Issues

Subscriptions

Contact KJ


Multicultural
Webfinds



Theme Issues

Unbound Online

Korea Online

In Translation

Interviews & Profiles

Encounters

KJ Reviews

Rambles

Blogology

KJ Readers' Resources

Recommended Links

Related Publications

Reviews of KJ

Distribution

Submissions

Helping KJ

 

 

KJ Reviews

The Teahouse Fire by Ellis Avery, Riverhead Books, 2006, 391 pp.
Reviewed by Susan Pavloska (KJ #66)

The Teahouse Fire is a historical novel of the subgenre known as the “Victorian lesbian romp;” however, since the locale is Kyoto, and its protagonists are practioners of the Art of Tea, displays of passion, like extraneous talk in the tearoom, are subject to rules… “more honored in the breach.”
The story centers on a real-life historical personage, Sen Yukako, who introduced tea ceremony into the curricula of girls’ schools during the Meiji Period (1868-1912). It is narrated by a fictional American woman of French extraction, Aurelia Bernard, who, as a lost child in the late-Tokugawa city of Miyako, is adopted by the infelicitously-named “Shin” family as a servant and companion to Yukako, the tea master’s only child. Despite this improbable beginning, Aurelia, re-named Urako, soon adapts herself to the household; from this vantage point she provides us with a fascinating, if necessarily confused account of daily life in Kyoto during the crucial years of Japan’s struggle to come to terms with the end of its centuries-long cultural and political isolation.

Unlike other historical novels set in 19th century Japan, The Teahouse Fire is located in the feminine interior of a Japanese house, making us bear witness not only to gendered exploitation, but also to the back-breaking labor necessary to create the one moment of beauty that is Tea. For author Avery, the feminization of tea in rapidly-modernizing Meiji Japan is not an indicator of its cultural marginalization (although Yukako seems to regard it that way), but rather the expression of an idea whose time has come. While in the West, giving parties is thought of as a “female” activity (think of Woolf’s representation of Mrs. Dalloway’s party as a symbol of thwarted female creativity) Avery reminds us that the creation of the perfect moment between host and guest in the tearoom was, in Japan, an exclusively male activity. Teaching women the Art of Tea thus de-essentializes “male” and “female” artistic forms, and also returns tea to its egalitarian roots. Not only samurai but members of the merchant class were deemed capable of understanding tea (Sen no Rikyu himself was, after all, a member of the 16th century merchant class). Avery expands this list to artisans, servants, women, and non-Japanese, and she even opens the door to the interesting possibility that the study of tea is best undertaken in cultures where equality is a core value. In any case it is significant that, in their respective eras, both Miss Urako and Rikyu are cast out and ordered to commit suicide for the same offense: disregarding social distinctions, or more precisely, the relationship between liege and vassal.

In one of the novel’s few love scenes, Avery draws a parallel: the study of tea is mirrored in the acts of lesbian lovemaking. However, the narrator’s sexual orientation is treated as matter-of-factly as the numerous baroque developments in the plot. What emerges most clearly from this carefully-researched novel is the realization that Japan still has not resolved the dilemma of its national identity vis-à-vis the West it encountered during the Meiji Period.

Copyright held by the author


Back to Reviews
Subscriptions